Monthly Archive for July, 2008

Grammar Vampires

Since I frequently work in the fantasy genre, and since I’m something of a gamer and a geek by hobby, fantasy elements are bound to creep into these posts fairly regularly. With that in mind, Monday’s post seems like a good segue into the introduction of one of my favorite terms, as well as a fairly important concept: the grammar vampire.

You’ve probably heard of grammar nazis, or maybe grammar police: these are people who patrol vigilantly, armed with their dictionaries, their thesauri and their love for words. They answer a deeply-rooted calling which urges them ever onward to stamp out typos, improper subject-verb agreement and rogue apostrophes wherever they may dwell. It’s a noble battle, don’t get me wrong, but sometimes the defenders of grammar get a little… well, overzealous.

I am not a grammar nazi. I’ll state that right now. For one thing, as much as I can appreciate the term in the proper spirit when others use it, personal beliefs and cultural heritage keep me from ever being comfortable applying it to myself. For another, it’s not really my style.

I eagerly seek out errors on menus and signs; spotting them is something of a hobby (albeit a shamefully geeky one), and often a source of great amusement. These are in the public domain, so I consider them fair game. I don’t, however, pounce on my friends, my family, my acquaintances, my casual email conversations, my forum discussions… you get the idea.

I fully appreciate that proper writing is important, and that pointing out an error is a necessary step to prevent its repetition. At the same time, I feel just as strongly that there’s a time and a place for such things, and I think it’s equally important to keep a sense of perspective about it. I may choose not to get into deep online conversations with someone whose spelling and grammar are atrocious, but at the same time, there are some situations where all that really matters is that people can make their points understood. Everyone makes typos. Everyone lets their fingers get ahead of them now and then. I see no benefit to antagonizing my peers by pouncing on their every mistake. All that does is, well, antagonize people. It doesn’t show off my knowledge or earn me any respect.

I like to think I’m a bit more subtle than that. I don’t rage about grammar; I’m not militant or aggressive about it. If I’m asked to beta-read or offer advice I’ll gladly do so, but I don’t force my red pen upon my friends or anyone else.

That’s the key to grammar vampires: they’re perfectly capable of correcting your mistakes, but they’ll only do so if you invite them in.

  • Share/Bookmark

Making Grammar Interesting

Before anyone was Eating, Shooting, or Leaving, a series of lesser-known books were already making grammar fun and accessible.

The New Well-Tempered Sentence: A Punctuation Handbook for the Innocent, the Eager, and the Doomed is for punctuation as The Deluxe Transitive Vampire: A Handbook of Grammar for the Innocent, the Eager and the Doomed is for sentence structure. Both books, by Karen Gordon, are fanciful romps that bring dull textbook lessons to life with a macabre, risqué flavor. If Edward Gorey and Bram Stoker had taught a college English course on writing bodice rippers, these books would have been their teaching aids.

The writing is evocative, the example sentences strange and whimsical enough to catch the eye and make the lessons memorable. From the introduction of “Well-Tempered Sentence”:

In writing, punctuation fills in for the clues we receive face to face. The rakish slash cries, “Give me ambiguity or give me death!” The promiscuous hyphen is game for liaisons with anyone. A period can pirouette and still make its point. An exclamation mark leaps onto the page in the place of flaming eyes, thumping fist, a defiant thrust of chin.

And her examples do just that!

“The baby vampire hurled his bottle at his nanny and screamed for type O instead,” illustrates a compound verb. For the simple, and ominous, subject: “It landed in the fountain after dark.”

Gorey-esque drawings of gargoyles and creatures are peppered through “Transitive Vampire”, while nearly-nudes of similar style and quirk peek from the pages of “Well-Tempered Sentence”. Though there is a Victorian flavor to the text, it presents correct and modern American English grammar and style rules. They are not presented with the precision and indexing of, say, Chicago Manual of Style, but they’re not meant to be. You’ll grin, giggle, perhaps, and possibly even retain some of those hard-to-recall rules of style. It’s uncommon to find instructional books that keep you turning the pages to see what examples will be presented next.

The series may not be for children or the faint of heart, but it is great fun for the rest of us. While not a must-have resource for every writer or editor’s bookshelf, the books are a delightful novelty for those of us who love words and their applications. A great conversation piece to share with your fellow wordcrafters, they will charm you, intrigue you, and perhaps even instruct you a bit, too. And they are reasonably priced, so you can indulge and sink your fangs into the entire series’ creamy pages.

  • Share/Bookmark

Measure Once, Cut Twice

The hardest kind of editing is self-editing. You will always find things you want to tweak, things you want to change, maybe even some sneaky little errors that your eye skipped over the first ten times through. The hardest part of self-editing is knowing when to stop editing. Know the difference between things that are actually incorrect and things that you think could have been better. I can’t tell you how many times I go in and tweak even these little blog posts, after I put them up! At some point, even those of us who nitpick for a living must accept that what we’ve written is the best that it can be, and we need to step away.

Conventional wisdom tells us to “measure twice, cut once”. Common sense, right? A cut can’t be undone, but an incorrect measurement can be corrected. It sounds great on paper. Having done my own share of home improvement, I’ve never had it work out that way in practice. Editing is no different. No matter how many times you measure—or how many times you read the same words—you will find something else to change. It will be so glaring that you will wonder how you could have possibly missed it before.

Am I saying that all editors are incompetent and will let errors through, and that you have to resign yourself to that? No. Not at all. I’m saying that you shouldn’t stop looking for errors just because you have an editor on the case, and I’m saying that you can expect a bit of second-guessing from yourself as you do your final read-throughs. And I’m saying that you need to be aware of the difference in scale between something that’s really wrong, and something you wish you’d phrased another way.

Conventional wisdom tells us that after you’ve cut, it’s too late to go back and fix things to meet the measurements. That’s not true, either. You can attach a little extra length onto that cut board, or patch a hole. Likewise, you can catch errors before they go to print. Or even after. Just make sure it’s that first kind of error. The truly incorrect kind. Cut twice if the boards don’t fit together at all. Not if you second-guess yourself and wish you’d gone with a completely different style of trim. That falls under “accepting and living with your choices, and stepping away”, per above.

Now, you can’t erase an error entirely. But you can re-record, re-release, re-send, or even put out a second edition. The sixth Harry Potter book was originally released with three or four typos in it. Even though the print run numbered in the millions of copies, Scholastic was still able to jump on top of it, push through a corrected second edition, and move forward. Are the uncorrected books still out there? Yes, undoubtedly, they are. Yours, undoubtedly, will also be. Going forward, however, you’ll have the satisfaction of knowing that every new sale, new page view, or new download is of the corrected, best version you can provide.

It sounds so easy, right? Well, how do you do it?

Read.

Really. That’s all there is to it.

When you get a draft back from your editor, don’t just jump from one change to the next. Really read it through again. Read every word. Try changing the font, or reading it out loud. The same words look different when their layout changes, making it easier to catch things you hadn’t caught before. Likewise, reading out loud forces you to slow down and focus on every word, keeping your brain from skipping over the parts it thinks it already knows.

When you get galleys back from your publisher, whether they’re the paper layout of a book or just a .pdf file, read them. Read every word. Read it like you’ve never seen it before. This is your last chance to catch little glitches before your work goes to print. Use this opportunity to your advantage. Always share your galleys with your editor, too. Your editor will be very unhappy if a layout or format mistake goes to print that she wasn’t given the opportunity to catch.

When the finished product is released. Read it. Read every word. Listen to your own podcast. Be your own customer and share in your readers’ and listeners’ experience. Enjoy it and take pride in it.

If you think you should have put your heroine in blue instead of green, consider it a lesson learned. But if you find that there’s been a processing error and two pages in the middle of your story, or two minutes in the middle of a broadcast, came out blank, you need to know about it. You can only fix problems that you know exist. It’s every writer’s nightmare, but it’s not the end of the world. That’s what you have a next edition (or a revised downloadable) for. Even if you’re writing for a periodical (which can’t be changed after it goes to press) an errata can still be published in the next issue, and you can have the corrected edition available for reprints.

Measure as many times as you can, but be comforted in the knowledge that if you need to, you can still cut twice.

  • Share/Bookmark

Some Tools of the Trade

In this digital age, we all do much more writing with a keyboard than with pen and paper. It’s possible to know and correspond with people for years without having any idea what your friends or associates’ handwriting looks like—something that would have been inconceivable even a couple of decades ago.

Writing is a different experience than typing. It feels different to your hands, it looks different to the eye, it requires different posture and a different set of behaviors. Some authors say they can’t write on paper. Some say they can’t write on a keyboard. It’s an individual choice, but if you’re feeling stuck with one, you may want to give the other a try. You may be surprised by what comes out.

I have a particular fondness for fountain pens, for their sleek appearance and the smooth way the ink flows out of them. I own three of them, at present, representing a wider range of cost and function than you might expect.

For everyday use, I have a Lamy Safari Vista Fountain Pen. Defying the convention that fountain pens are a formal, stuffy indulgence, the Lamy Safari is inexpensive and sturdy plastic, and comes in many bright colors and, as mine is, clear. Not only is it casual, whimsical and fun to look at, but it also makes it easy to see at a glance how much ink you have left.

Rotring’s 600 Series are the military tanks of fountain pens. Made of chrome-plated brass that sits heavily in your hand, they are eight-sided to prevent them from rolling off the table and crushing your toes. No… seriously, they’re not quite that heavy, but they do feel pleasantly indestructible. And they still write very smoothly and cleanly. They’re discontinued, from what I’ve read, and might be difficult to find, but they’re definitely worth a search.

Finally, my third recommendation is the kind of higher-end pen that most people think of when they think of fountain pens, but it still manages a fun twist on the classic: Pilot/Namiki’s Vanishing Point Fountain Pen has a retractable point, combining the smooth elegance of a fountain pen with the convenience of a ballpoint. It writes beautifully, though it does feel a little more fragile than the others, and it’s better suited to some types of paper than others.

You don’t need a fountain pen to write your next masterpiece, but don’t forget that hand writing is a skill like any other, and the old skills still have their place. Sitting down with a beautiful blank journal and a well-crafted instrument can create a different frame of mind, and those changes might reflect in your writing. Something to keep in mind the next time you’re feeling stuck, or just needing a break from the keys.

  • Share/Bookmark

Fun With Words

I love words. I love the way they fit together to evoke vivid images, the way they can be wielded with great power, or with a feather’s gentle touch. I love that their subtleties can be twisted into clever plays on themselves, by mistake as well as by design.

Humor is an important facet of the power of words, and twists on words will feature regularly in this blog. Spotting amusing signs and unfortunate typos is something of a guilty pleasure, and some of the best may find their way into these pages.

With that in mind, allow me to share this performance of “The Impotence of Proofreading“, by Taylor Mali.

(note: video. contains some mature language and subject matter)

  • Share/Bookmark

Creeps to watch out for

A manuscript is not a linear creature. We go back and change. We revise a sentence. A paragraph. A concept. We reorder chapters. New content integrates with old. Ideally, it does this seamlessly.

However, a manuscript is also not a body of water. The changes made to the early pages don’t ripple naturally through the rest of the text. (If only they did!) They need to be caught, by careful eye and hand. The mind is a tricky thing, and it often sees what it expects to see. When your eyes are so familiar with the words that you’re not entirely reading the page anymore, gradual or minor changes are very easy to miss.

Keeping aware of the tendency toward these kinds of mistakes is the best defense against them. Since they tend to creep stealthily into a manuscript, I call them creeps. This post will introduce you to two types of creep and discuss how you can guard yourself against them. Watch this spot—future posts may warn against more!

1. Creeping names.

You know this one. Your town starts out as Sullyville and changes to Sulleyville at some point halfway through the book. Character names, place names, and any other invented words are equally susceptible to the mid-manuscript creep.

Simple words, complex words, words with odd uses of apostrophes or hyphens, are all vulnerable! With complexity, however, comes increased vulnerability. You’re more likely to reproduce your choices correctly if you leave little room for variation. This is an especially sticky trap for science fiction and fantasy writers, whose texts are almost certain to be sprinkled with many invented words and unusual character and place names—if not a sampling of an entire invented language!

My defense against the creeping name is two-fold, but simple: I drop any invented name I expect to be seeing frequently into my spellchecker’s dictionary. That way, I’ll have a built-in notifier if any of them decide to evolve and change. I also keep a paper list of character and place names, for quick reference. Sometimes a name will creep to a valid name or word, so the spellcheck method isn’t guaranteed, but it is a great first line of defense. If I’m unsure, I can always glance down at the list on my desk for confirmation. You can avoid creeping names in your writing by doing the same. A written list that you can check at a glance is a simple tool, but an effective one.

2. Creeping NPCs.

NPC stands for “Non-Player Character”. In gaming circles, it’s a term used to indicate those incidental characters who exist only to forward a plot or facilitate a goal. The merchant from whom your characters buy their adventuring supplies, for instance, is probably a walk-on role. Once your characters leave his shop, the reader will likely never see him again. The character’s unseen brother back home, former roommate, ex-girlfriend or old high school teacher, whom he speaks about a few times but who is never seen, is also an NPC for our purposes.

The rule for NPCs is an obvious one: Name them once. However, several chapters and several months may go by while you’re working on your manuscript. As you’re working on chapter twenty, you may forget that Jane Doe was mentioned by name in chapter two. Or, conversely, as you’re adding a personal touch to chapter two, you may forget that you named her in chapter twenty.

Again, a separate list comes in handy. At whatever point in the story you give them a name, jot it down. Add their title or relation to your primary characters, as appropriate. If you give them any notable characteristics, note those, too. You can even start written biographies of sorts, of your characters, and profiles of your towns, adding to them as you name or describe relevant family members or neighbors.

Many of us keep our characters’ backgrounds in little capsules in our heads, pulling out strands or facts as needed. Setting those facts down in an easily referenced way can help the writer, and even inspire ideas for character development or transitionary scenes, and it can help the editor as well. Forward your lists along with your manuscript! If your sister is Jane in chapter two and Susan in chapter twenty, it’ll save both of us a query later on if I already know which name she prefers to go by. Not that your sister is, you know… a creep.

  • Share/Bookmark

A different kind of search engine

Sometimes if you don’t remember the title or author of a book, you can still find it by searching on the name of a character or a fictional city, but how do you find a book again if you only remember the plot?

Allreaders.com has the answer: a search engine that allows you to find books within the genre of your choice by plot, main character, main adversary, setting or style, or even just do a one-click search for the more common plots within that genre.

I tested it out, with a book obscure enough that I wasn’t expecting it to be in the list in the first place: Marge Piercy’s He, She and It. I searched by main character, recalling that the protagonist was a female scientist in her 20s or 30s. While the book wasn’t at the top of the 100-title result list, it was there!

Also there, though, were 99 other books with female scientist protagonists in their 20s or 30s. Some I’ve read, some I haven’t. I don’t often need to look up a book I’ve forgotten, but being able to browse books by key features is a fantastic thing, too. I can see using this search engine as a tool to supplement my reading wish list for a long time to come.

  • Share/Bookmark

Welcome!

I thought I’d start off here with a link to one of my favorite resources: The Chicago Manual of Style‘s online edition has a great Q&A page. It’s a really useful tool for finding answers to those gray-area questions that fall between the lines in the book itself.

  • Share/Bookmark