Author Archive for admin

The painful ‘nowning’ process

BUFFY: How do you get to be renowned? I mean, like, do you have to be ‘nowned’ first?
WILLOW: Yes, first there’s the painful ‘nowning’ process.

(Buffy the Vampire Slayer, episode 4.1 “The Freshman”)

Clever wording aside, the process of gaining renown is, often, a painful one. Yet, renown, or reputation, or recognition, or whatever you want to call it, is important to a writer’s career.

It’s rarely enough that your book stands out from the crowd; you have to stand out from the crowd, too. Name recognition is important when you’re trying to sell your product or your service. It’s important when you’re trying to sell your book to a publisher and then ultimately to the end reader.

It’s not enough to sit back and expect your publisher to sell you and make you a star. All else being equal, a publisher will select the author who already has that star power on their own. They’ll pick someone who knows notable authors who might provide blurbs for the book. They’ll pick award-winners, or authors who have been published in notable places, or whose podcasts attract tens or hundreds of thousands of subscribers. You need contacts, credentials… you need renown. And you need to build that renown for yourself. Other people may be able to provide you with some of the opportunities, but no one else can do the legwork for you.

Over time, this blog will dip into several ways to build renown. For today, I’m going to focus on one.

“Award-winning author…” is a great thing to have in front of your name. “New York Times Bestselling…” is even better, “award-nominated” is a good place to start, but “award-winning” carries a nice amount of weight.

There are two ways to win awards. One is to sit back and wait for attention to come to you (the writing equivalent of being spotted by a talent scout or a recruiter). This can happen. It’s not very likely, and it’s not something you should count on. There is no award fairy to fly in your window and exchange the manuscript under your pillow for a trophy and a big check.

The actual process of winning awards is a more painful one, but considering that it’s a part of the painful nowning process, a little discomfort is certainly to be expected.

Submit your writing to contests.

There are a lot of scam contests out there. However, there are a lot of contests that aren’t scams, too.

Writer Beware has a great section on literary contests and how to tell the real ones from the scams. Preditors and Editors has an extensive list of writing contests, annotated with recommendations and warnings.

Poetry is also an option, if you don’t want to take your prose fiction off the market. About.Com links to an extensive collection of poetry contests (some of these contests sport multiple categories: they may other fiction and nonfiction writing categories in addition to poetry. Potentially worth a glance even for non-poets), a few essays about the reliability of contests, and their benefits and risks. Additionally, Absolute Write’s excellent advice on spotting poetry contest scams can be broadened to general literary contests.

Writers are often wary of even the most legitimate of contests, and with good reason:

Many contests have stipulations about simultaneous submissions and published works. You may end up taking your publishable work off the market if you submit it to a contest, losing time that you could be spending submitting to publishers. Additionally, there are very few contests out there that are notable and reputable enough to add to your renown. A publisher will not be impressed if you’ve won a spot in a zine they’ve never heard of.

And many contests charge an entry fee. These fees are used to reimburse the judges for their time, and to fund the prize pool, so many legitimate contests do have entry fees. Preditors and Editors advises against entering contests with entry fees, especially if the prize isn’t significantly more than the fee. It’s a fair recommendation—multiple submissions can add up quickly to a considerable expense that the new writer might not be able to justify or afford—but I would personally be more wary of a contest that didn’t have an entry fee.

The expenses inherent in a contest will have to be paid sooner or later, and I would be wary of the “later” (for example, will the publisher expect you to pay to have your submission published once you’ve won?) if I wasn’t asked for a small fee up front. Always, always read the entry rules and the fine print. If something seems fishy, ask. If the reward is publication of a book, make sure it’s with a reputable press, and that you won’t be expected to cover the costs.

All that being said, finding a small but reputable literary contest with renown of its own—literary journals run by university presses, or by publishers you’ve heard of, are often a safer bet—can be worth the expense. Winning a substantial prize may well make up for the initial entry fee investment, it might get your work in front of influential authors, depending on who the judges are, and the distribution you may receive through publication in a journal with a wide readership may be worth having withheld your work from traditional publication streams.

There are no easy answers, but it’s an option to be aware of. Ultimately, it’s up to you. Winning a writing contest, all by itself, will not be the springboard that launches your sudden success. Entering contests can be good practice. It can inspire you to write toward a deadline. And it can even, if you’re fortunate and if you’re careful to submit to reputable and noteworthy contests, lead to a little bit of money and a little bit of renown.

  • Share/Bookmark

In Homage to Mr. Poe

Today is the 200th anniversary of the birth of Edgar Allan Poe. In his honor, Evil Editor is calling for short-short-short stories or scenes in the style of Mr. Poe.

The link is here. Reference works by Poe can be found here. The deadline is Sunday the 24th. The limit is 400 words.

Enter. Enjoy! I’ll be checking back to see what you come up with.

  • Share/Bookmark

Grammarphobic?

When it comes to commonly misunderstood rules of spelling or grammar (like whether to use “discreet” or “discrete”, “fewer” or “less”, or “as if it was” over “as if it were”), I’ve often found that a writer who is uncertain about the correct usage will alternate back and forth. It may be completely unintentional, but it sometimes comes across as trying to cover all your bases: “If I do this both ways, I’ll be right half the time!”

The most daunting part of researching all these nitpicky rules is knowing where to look. Thick, old reference books may be outdated, and often the words involved are too common to produce any useful search results—or the answers may be too contested for the results to be trustworthy.

The blog at grammarphobia.com is a great resource for editors and writers alike. You’ll find the answers to many of these sorts of issues, reliably researched and well cited. A convenient search bar helps you sort through the archives, and a contact link allows you to ask your question if it hasn’t already been covered.

  • Share/Bookmark

Editing Tests

How Publishers Hire Editors

I should start with a disclaimer: I’ve never had to take an editing test. I’m at a point in my career where I’m kept pleasantly busy with my work for Dragon Moon Press, and my additional projects arrive through referralssituations in which my work has already spoken for itself.

My experience with editing tests is from the other side, as an Editor-In-Charge. I’m now in a position to hire other freelance editors and delegate projects to them. I admit, it makes me very uncomfortable to do so.

I know the problems I’m likely to face in a manuscript. I feel confident that know how to ride the line between polishing up a sentence and moving it out of the author’s voice; what to mess with and what to leave alone. I know how to address an author in a friendly and non-confrontational way, yet still fight for an edit if it’ll make a stronger book.

I know my own level of attentiveness to detail. I don’t know anyone else’s, if I haven’t seen their work. Handing over a novel-length manuscript and hoping everything will be all right when I look at the proofs, isn’t a time-effective way to find out. Enter: the editing test.

An editing test should be an open-book test, because an open-book test displays your ability to find the answers you need, not your inherent knowledge. No editor edits in a reference-free vacuum. I don’t actually want to test how much you know. I want to test your ability to identify the things you need to check on, and your ability to use reference material to check on it. It’s more important that things stand out as “wrong” or “questionable” to you, than that you know offhand how to make them right. I don’t care if you know when to use “affect” or “as if it were” or if you can spell “Antietam”. I care that you know what to look up, and where to look it up. I care that correct words in incorrect contexts will stand out to you. I need you to be able to catch not only the obvious spelling mistakes, but the kinds of spelling mistakes that a spell-checker won’t find, too.

My editing tests aren’t straightforward grammar and punctuation multiple choice tests. I don’t request a writing sample, either. Seeing a finished product isn’t the same as seeing someone’s work, since I don’t know what state the manuscript was in before it came to them. I’ve edited some very clean manuscripts that have only needed a handful of corrections. I’ve also edited some manuscripts that have needed tough love. In my opinion, sending an editor a few pages or a very short chapter to mark up will paint a much better picture of that editor’s ability.

I want to see that all the spelling, punctuation and grammar errors are caught. I want to see if awkward or misleading phrases are recast or left alone. I want to sprinkle in a continuity errormaybe make someone stand, and then stand again once they’re already standingto see if that’s caught, as well. I want to get a sense of the editor’s personality: are they going to be too timid to suggest changes, and simply proofread instead? Are they going to try to rewrite too much? Or will they hit that sweet middle ground?

How Writers Hire Editors

It’s important to note that, as a writer, hiring an editor is a very different process. An individual writer won’t be able to administer this sort of test to an editor. I’ve heard of cases where writers have tried to solicit a free “test” chapter each from a handful of editors, to end up with a finished product that’s been edited (or at least proofread) for free. Don’t do this. You will get an inconsistent book, and your name will be mumbled disapprovingly by a lot of annoyed editors who will never work with you again.

As an editor, I’m happy to look at a manuscript, or a sample of a manuscript. A sample is essential for me to provide an evaluation so that I can tell you what level of work the manuscript will need and what sort of rate I’d charge to do that work, but I won’t give free samples of the actual work.

Do ask for an editor’s credits and credentials. Ask if you can contact some of their clients for references. A good editor who has done good work and left happy clients behind them will have nothing to hide.

  • Share/Bookmark

Mascot: Editorcat

I had a serious post in mind for today, but I saw this on icanhascheezburger last night and, well, I think this one speaks for itself.


I never have days like this, either.

Actually, I’m really fortunate right now. All my clients lately have been wonderful, eloquent, and easy to work with. May the trend continue!

  • Share/Bookmark

Old Books, Online

Way, way back (or, at least, a long time ago as Internet history goes), there was Project Gutenberg. It began in 1971, with project founder Michael Hart typing in the Declaration of Independence, and slowly expanded to include other historical documents and out-of-copyright literature.

In 1991, Project Gutenberg took its current form. Its initial goal was to add one book per month. In 2006, with the help of volunteers around the world, it saw the addition of an average of 400 books per month, according to the general FAQ.

(As a proud citizen of the Internet, I’m pleased to say I did my part. The book I helped to transcribe is number 769 of the collection: Okakura’s The Book of Tea.)

If you’re a more recent arrival to the Internet, you might not be familiar with Project Gutenberg, but chances are good that you’ll know about Google Books.

Google started with the same idea: making out-of-copyright books available online. They’ve expanded the concept to include out-of-print books, and have come to a settlement with publishers and authors about the distribution of out-of-print but in-copyright material, as well as the distribution of current in-copyright and in-print books, as well.

For Google’s summary of their service: http://books.google.com/googlebooks/agreement/

The New York Times has a good article about the Google settlement, and what it means for researchers, readers, and publishers.

I think that anything that grants access to literature and information, while still acknowledging and respecting the rights of the owners of that information, is a good thing. Do I think this will kill paper publishing? No. Not at all.

What do you think?

  • Share/Bookmark

Back to Work

I had a lovely holiday with family, and now I’m back in the office looking at the two manuscripts on my desk.

In the spirit of the season, my mother had asked me if I would like one of those “I am the grammarian about whom your mother warned you” shirts. I graciously declined, and pointed her toward my Grammar Vampires post.

However, in the process of browsing related things, I did come across the irritable vowels shirt. (second item on the page)

irritable vowels @ themorningnews.org

I never have days like that.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tips on Naming Characters

1. Choose names for members of a culture that follow a cultural thread.

Names don’t have to be so similar that they’re indistinct, or rhyme, or all have the same vowel-consonant patterns. But in most successful science fiction or fantasy, names from a given culture have at least something in common.

Think about the ways you can tell a Spanish name from a Russian name from a Korean name, for instance.

Now think about how you can tell a Vulcan name from a Klingon name. You’d know just from the name what kind of creature you’d be expecting to meet, wouldn’t you?

2. Choose distinct names.

As a general rule of thumb, two characters in a book shouldn’t have the same first name unless there’s a specific plot-related reason for them to do so. The same goes for names that sound or look similar. Don’t create that confusion for your readers unless you have a reason to. You’ll be throwing a lot of names at your readers at once, most likely: characters, places, objects and concepts. They’ll be trying to integrate and remember all of these names while they’re trying to follow your story and get the context of the world you’ve created, all at the same time. Don’t confuse them by making them keep ‘Jazon’ and ‘Jaxom’ straight in their heads.

3. Don’t make your job more difficult than you have to.

The more complicated a name is (or the more apostrophes it has in it) the greater your chances are to screw it up. Be aware of complicated strings of vowels or consonants, doubled consonants, and the dreaded apostrophe. Names can and do drift and change over the course of writing a novel. The more complicated your naming scheme is, the more likely it is that you will slip. Apostrophes present complications all their own. Don’t even get me started on what a joy it is to go through and fix four hundred pages of inconsistent straight- and smart-quotes.

4. Don’t make your readers’ job more difficult than you have to.

If your readers can’t pronounce your characters’ names… they won’t. This will not only inhibit them from forming an emotional connection with your characters or keeping them distinct as they read, but it will inhibit them from talking about your book with others, too.

If your readers can’t spell your characters’ names, they won’t. If you’re lucky, they’ll find some abbreviation or nickname for the characters, and if you’re very lucky, they won’t be derogatory. If you’re not so lucky, they simply won’t write about them (or write reviews, or discuss them online and advertise your book through the grapevine) at all.

  • Share/Bookmark

Capital I is for Internet

Your editor is hard at work. I’m juggling three manuscripts, with a fourth soon on the way, and I’m trying to clear my desk before the holidays. If I haven’t been around in the usual places — Twitter, Skype, or wherever you might normally find me — now you know why.

One common thread I’ve found through the fiction and the non-fiction I’ve been working on lately, and even in some of the social forums I dip into, is the proper handling of words relating to our online experience.

Since these are issues I find myself looking up and referencing time and again, I thought that I would share my references in one convenient place.

Chicago Manual of Style informs us that Web site should be two words, and the same goes for Web page, and that while the capital W may become obsolete someday, that day has not yet come. For now, we still recognize Web as a proper noun, short for World Wide Web.

Similarly, capital-I Internet is the preferred usage. However, online has edged out the previously preferred “on-line”, by virtue of its inclusion in the American Heritage (4th ed., 2000) dictionary.

E-mail retains its hyphen for now, and is capitalized when it begins a sentence.

  • Share/Bookmark

Contracts

Are contracts really necessary? Isn’t making someone sign a contract for editing work like saying you don’t trust them to pay?

There’s a lot more to a contract than just “Ha! Now you HAVE to pay me!” and “Ha! Now you HAVE to do the work!”

Contracts set out the expectations of both parties. If I’m editing for you, you want to know exactly what I’m going to do to your manuscript, how I’m going to do it, and when it’s going to be done. I want the assurance that I’m getting paid at a rate we’ve agreed on, and that I’m getting credit for my work. I want to make clear up front exactly how much work that rate of pay is buying.

Don’t think of a contract as a statement of distrust, it’s the handshake at the end of the negotiation. It’s the opportunity to list out expectations and agree upon them before the work starts, so that the needs of both parties are met and there are no sudden changes or last minute surprises later.

There may be a temptation to handwave the whole contract process for a simple job, or a quick job, or a cheap job, or a job from someone you trust. Don’t. I get a signed contract from every writer who hires me, or a purchase order from every larger company. Get into the habit of creating contracts and invoices, and getting anything to do with terms or payments in writing. For tax purposes, you’ll need to. And some day, some sort of discrepancy may pop up, and having a signed agreement to reference for clarification may make all the difference between a frustrating negotiation and a smooth one.

There’s a great sample contract available for download from Editors’ Association of Canada. I’ve used this as a base and modified it for my own purposes; they invite anyone to do the same.

  • Share/Bookmark