Archive for the 'Links' Category

SeptOctWriMos: Stretching the Writing Muscles

Each November, writers all over the world participate in NaNoWriMo, National Novel-Writing Month. The goal of NaNoWriMo is to write 50,000 words on a novel in thirty days. A huge community forms around this shared goal every year, with aspiring authors supporting each other, providing motivation and reference resources and writing tips.

But there’s a problem with it: 50,000 words is a good challenge for a month’s worth of writing, but 50,000 words doesn’t a novel make. Not in the current adult fiction market as it stands, anyway. It’s a good start, but it’s not the whole thing. Especially not if you’re writing only with an eye to word count, which probably means a there’s a significant amount of padding going on. (Expect a post here about padding your word count closer to November 1.)

Pushing out 50,000 words in a month leaves many participants facing December with exhaustion, strained eyesight and fingers, a project that isn’t finished, and little motivation to keep going. Often, there’s no desire to even look at the work-in-progress again for a good long time. There’s a reason why National Novel Editing Month doesn’t come around until the following March.

Writer J.M. Frey (whose forthcoming novel Triptych is one of my current projects!) has suggested a strategy to give NaNoWriMo some closure. She’s proclaimed September 1st to be the start of NaNoWriMo Warm-Up. Her premise: writing 30,000 words over the two-month span of September and October will get writers in the groove for November, and will give them the opportunity to end up with an 80,000-word novel (a respectable length for a completed first draft) when all is said and done.

I think it’s an ambitious idea, but I also think that anyone who aspires to be a professional writer needs to develop the discipline to keep up a brisk writing pace for more than a single month, and needs to prioritize having a completed project above reaching an arbitrary word count. This could be a good exercise toward developing that discipline, and it’s an interesting add-on to the NaNoWriMo concept.

See the link above for more information, and let me know how it goes if you decide to participate!

  • Share/Bookmark

Twitter for Writers

Since the realms of journalism and fiction-writing don’t seem to intersect as often as they should, you may have missed an interesting post this week that asks the question Can Twitter Make You a Better Editor?

We all know that Twitter is a great social media tool, connecting writers with readers and with the publishing community as a whole. But journalist Erin Everhart (@erinever in the Twitterverse) suggests that Twitter can help us actually improve our self-editing. I strongly recommend clicking over and reading her post if you haven’t.

Not only does Twitter force you to condense your thoughts into 140-character chunks, but it makes you narrow your posts down even further than that if you want them to be re-Tweeted without further editing. That means pruning your words down as far as possible, and then a little bit more.

Twitterers tend to go one of two ways: they drift into abbreviations and “text-speak” to fit their words in, or they focus on concision and economy of words and meaning.

I think there’s a blend of both that’s inevitable, but I’d say most people tend naturally toward one or the other. For writers, editors, and others in the publishing field, it’s (thankfully) the latter.

If you tend toward a lot of txt-speak in your tweets, but you want to be taken seriously as a writer, I suggest you get out of that habit. (u kno who u r.)

Since this blog is about strengthening writing, I want to suggest taking it a step further: make use Twitter’s limitations in a deliberate way, and take that 140-character limitation as a challenge. Practice expressing a lot in a single message without resorting to txt-ish shortcuts. Try condensing the plot of a classic of film or literature into a single tweet.

Can you express your story’s elevator pitch in 140 characters? In the process, you’ll be keying in on the heart of its most central conflict, possibly in a more surgical, precise way than you have before. You might learn something new about your story in the process, or just discover a more eyecatching way to express it. That’s something you can use no matter where you are in the writing process: when you’re rewriting your next draft, or when you’re crafting a compelling pitch for your query. And the need for that precision doesn’t stop when your book is published — that’s when it starts. Then you’ll need that concise summary for your marketing material, for interviews and appearances and family gatherings, and any time someone asks, “So, what’s your book about?”

To take it further, there’s a growing trend of fiction in 140: complete micro-mini short stories no longer than a single tweet. For some examples, see:

@arjunbasu
@astoryin140
@midnightstories
@microprose
@motkedapp
@tweetthemeat
@twitterfiction
@veryshortstory

How’s this for incentive? There are even some paying markets where you can submit your own microfiction. See:

@nanoism
@thaumatrope

Thinking in fewer characters can train you to make every word matter in your writing, but that Twitter can be an even better training tool if you’re aware of it and make use of it as one.

  • Share/Bookmark

My Dragon*Con schedule

I’ve got a light schedule… which is good, because Dragon*Con is full of things to do and people to see! You can catch up with me at:

SAT Sept 4, HILTON 204, 10:00 AM
Podcasting Authors Roundtable.
Join a roundtable discussion of working writers who utilize podcasting to distribute and promote their work.
Panelists: Scott Sigler, Gail Z. Martin, Michael A. Stackpole, Christiana Ellis, P.G. Holyfield, Gabrielle Harbowy

SAT Sept 4, HYATT Regency V Ballroom, 4:00 PM
5th Annual Parsec Awards
The Parsec Awards recognize excellence in Speculative Fiction Podcasting

Or drop me a line on Twitter or via the contact tab above.

  • Share/Bookmark

Philippa Ballantine’s Call to Arms

Consider this a demonstration of two things: how slowly things in publishing can seem to move, and how quickly momentum can build. And consider it an invitation to be a part of it.

You’ve been listening to me talk about Geist by Philippa Ballantine for quite a while now. I had the honor and pleasure to work with Pip on the copyediting of this manuscript before it was purchased by Ace, so it’s been very exciting for me to see Pip and the book go through the whole corporate publishing process.

Now, at long last, release date is almost upon us. The book has a gorgeous cover by artist Jason Chan, a compelling story and a cast of unforgettable characters in a world with its own unique brand of magic.

I’ve loved this story for a long time, and I keep falling in love with it all over again. Soon, you’ll have that chance, too. In the meantime, you can be part of the process. Go to Pip’s blog and read this post to learn how you can do your part to spread the word, show the publisher that this book is in demand, and make the difference that will keep the series going until its story is told.

  • Share/Bookmark

Gatekeeping

In this new world model of publishing, the traditional gatekeepers — editors, agents, publishers — are finding themselves in a slightly different position. Self-publishing is on the rise, and anyone dissatisfied with “the system” can choose to detour around the gates and the gatekeepers entirely. But that does not encourage the gatekeepers to abandon their posts; quite the contrary, in fact.

Over at Black Gate Magazine, my friend Peadar Ó Guilín explains why the gatekeepers are still with us, and why they’re important.

As a gatekeeper, I can tell you that there is a vast sea of fiction out there that is fantastic, but it’s a drop in a larger ocean of work that is unpolished, not self-aware of the fact that it has flaws, and just not ready to be published. It’s unfortunate that the writers who pen great works are the ones who are self-conscious of their writing and are more prone to be the ones to wonder if it’s good enough, while the ones who have the longest way to go are sometimes the most blind to that fact.

The gatekeepers try to add balance and perspective. Getting rejected is frustrating, but sometimes it’s for a writer’s own good. Working with the system and improving to reach that bar requires learning, dedication, and talent. Bypassing the system perhaps seems easier, and in rare cases it can have good results. But in the long run it isn’t necessarily best for the writer (who loses out on a chance for professional advice and guidance) or for the reader (who must wade through more quantity to find quality).

  • Share/Bookmark

2010 Parsec Finalists

The 2010 Parsec Award Finalists have been announced, and I’m quite pleased to see my story “Swimming Lessons” from P.G. Holyfield’s Tales of the Children anthology listed in the Best Speculative Fiction Story (Short Form) category!

I’m up against some serious competition. It’s an honor to even be nominated alongside writers like Peter Watts, Mike Resnick, Scott Sigler and Tim Pratt.

Congrats, also, to all the rest of this year’s nominees!

The Parsec Award ceremony will be held at DragonCon on Saturday, September 4 at 4 PM in the Hyatt’s Regency V Ballroom.

  • Share/Bookmark

Renaissance Woman

Interview: Gabrielle Harbowy, Renaissance Woman, courtesy of The Dead Robots’ Society Podcast

It was a pleasure to meet up with the wonderful crew of the Dead Robots’ Society Podcast this week for an interview. It was a particular honor because the DRS interview with editor Juliet Ulman had been so inspirational for me. Working in an isolated sort of environment like editors do, and doing work that should (if it’s done well) be invisible, doesn’t lend itself to having access to many role models. Hearing Juliet talk about editing and express eloquently so many of the things I believe, or aim to do in my work, or have observed in my own experience so far, helped to affirm for me that I was doing it right — both in terms of how I approach authors and their work, and how I approach my own career.

My interview was a long time coming. Various scheduling obstacles kept getting in the way, but I’m glad that the interest and determination held on both sides. It was a lot of fun, and it turned out to be completely unlike the other interviews I’ve done.

What’s changed? Well… I think… me.

Instead of focusing on how to format a submission, or how to edit, or when to edit, the interview focused on how I balance being an editor, an associate publisher, and a writer.

It was especially interesting because I don’t really think of myself as a writer. Not yet.

I’ve got one story, “Swimming Lessons” up in PG Holyfield’s “Tales of the Children” podcast anthology. That story is on the longlist for a Parsec Award(!).

I have another story — my first professional sale! — which will be appearing in an anthology this December. More news as the date nears, or you can listen to the interview for a couple more hints.

I have a story out on someone’s desk at a major market, and two more in the works.

But editing comes first for me. Though I think I’m constantly learning and improving in all aspects of the business and editing is no exception, it’s where I feel I really shine. And for me, editing blends naturally into publishing. I’m so used to being “hands on” with a novel, having held it from slush pile through editorial, that it seems natural to be the one to take it into typesetting and layout, to discuss promotional opportunities and offer to be the contact person for reviewers and award committees.

Would I be content “just editing”? Could I give those extra responsibilities up? Sure. But I like being busy, and I’m grateful for the opportunity and for the insight I’m gaining into the industry by being able to be more involved in different aspects of it.

I feel the same way about writing. I’m discovering that I enjoy it, and I’m also enjoying the “sensitivity training” that it lends to my editing. I have a different perspective on a lot of things now: I’m more aware of the agonizing wait for authors with work on somebody’s slush pile; I’m more aware of the uncertainty someone feels when they open up a file full of red ink. I feel that I can relate to my clients a little better, because I’m one of them. I understand their half of the experience.

All around, I’d say it’s all easy to balance. Each side of the triangle — writing, editing, publishing — gives me more insight on the other two. All together, it’s an invaluable, ongoing education. Even if I end up focusing more narrowly on one facet or the other down the road, I’ll still be able to bring to it a rounded perspective on the industry that will always inform my actions, no matter what I’m working on from day to day.

Thanks again to the guys at DRS for having me on and inviting me to share my thoughts!

You can follow the Dead Robots’ Society on the web at DeadRobotsSociety.com
on Twitter at @DRSPodcast
and on Facebook at Listeners of the Dead Robots’ Society.

  • Share/Bookmark

Marketing Tips for the Introverted Author

Fans who see authors at signings and readings and conventions may not realize that authors — just like anyone else — can be introverted, can get stage fright, or can be uncomfortable approaching others or putting themselves in the limelight. It’s one thing for a book to get great acclaim; it’s another thing to squint into the spotlight, yourself.

Last week, Marketing Tips for Authors blog featured a post by Duolit, called Conquering Book Marketing Fear: Seven Tips for the Introverted Author.

This post discusses ways to overcome that fear of putting yourself out there, and has some great tips for brand-building for everyone, introvert or not.

  • Share/Bookmark

Advice for Copyeditors

I’m trying to get ready to go out of town and deal with the loose ends regarding my mother’s estate, so today’s post will be short and sweet, and Thursday’s post may well be absent, or equally brief.

This blog often offers advice for new writers, but advice for new copyeditors is very important as well.

The Subversive Copyeditor blogged some random advice for copyeditor newbies today, and it’s all important stuff.

I would move back a step and add a few absolute basics to that excellent list:

  • Pick a single style guide and a single dictionary and stick to them. It should be no surprise that different style guides (Chicago vs AP vs MLA) will feature very different rules. If they didn’t, each style of publication wouldn’t have its own. However, different dictionaries will also allow/feature slight variations. Don’t pick the one that agrees with you on a particular word, pick one standard reference and make it your guide. I also pick one standard backup dictionary, just in case.

  • Look up EVERYTHING you think you know. Sometimes colloquial usage isn’t the same as correct usage. Before you switch “never mind” to one word throughout a manuscript because that’s the way you’ve always spelled it, look it up. Look up “lie/lay/lain/laid” and make yourself a grid. Don’t go with what “sounds right,” take the time to find out what IS right.
  • Don’t overcorrect, either. Editing fiction isn’t the same as editing non-fiction. There’s a lot more latitude in fiction, especially in regard to dialogue and narrative voice. If a character is young, uneducated, informal, or would have some other reason to use “there’s” to mean “there are,” let the character use it. If a character never uses contractions, ever, then help the author stay true to that style choice. It’s important to develop a sense of what to correct and what to leave alone.
  • If you find yourself looking up the same things all the time, write them out on a separate cheat-sheet for yourself. I do this for things like grey/gray (I never remember which one is the UK spelling and which one is US), or whether song lyrics get quotation marks or italics. I always write out the full rule with the citation so that I can cite my source without having to go back to the book.
  • Be aware of your tone with clients, whether authors or employers. Keep it professional but approachable. Never, ever taunt or insult a client for a mistake in the manuscript or word your queries in such a way as to imply a value judgment about the manuscript or the specific choices therein. In your queries and comments, speak in terms of rules of grammar or style, in terms of character consistency, or ambiguity of phrase, or the conventions of the genre. It’s okay to use a lighthearted tone if you’ve got sufficient rapport with a client to do so appropriately (and even then, know the boundaries). Don’t go over the line into too familiar, too risque, patronizing, or disapproving. It’s not your place.
  • If you’ve decided to make cold calls (writing or calling a publisher to ask them if they have work they can give you), do your homework before you send a letter to someone and ask them to hire you. Get your contact name right, and get the gender of that contact person right, too. Please spell-check your letter. Check to make sure that you remove the lingering form-letter bits from your last letter that don’t fit your current one. And, just like writers submitting queries for manuscripts, take an extra moment to find out if they’re actually hiring, and if they have a process for sending that letter. Editing is a detail-oriented job, so you’ll only shoot yourself in the foot if you fail to pay attention to the details when you make your first impression.

(Also see: The Last-Glance Editing Checklist)

  • Share/Bookmark

Cheryl Klein on Commas (and Squids!)

Cheryl Klein doesn’t know it, but she was one of my inspirations when I decided to go into editing full-time. I was working at in the book club division at Scholastic, just a couple floors away. I don’t think we ever even met, though we exchanged email once over a typo.

But the idea that there were people in the same office I was in, working magic on magical books, made me hunger to do a lot more than sales projection and analysis. I didn’t want to proofread spreadsheets or corporate database entries for the rest of my life. I was still part of the magic, and I knew that what I did was, on a large scale, vital. But once it really registered that there were people who got to sink up to their elbows in the books themselves, I wanted nothing else than to be one of them.

Cheryl’s blog holds a lot of insight about editing. She’s the sort of editor I aspire to be, less interested in applying rules of grammar with a broad brush and more interested in focusing on each individual story and how best to bring forth what’s at its heart.

SQUIDS 101: Punctuation: Commas is a perfect example of this. Commas are tricky because they’re often subjective. A sentence can be equally correct, technically, with or without. But commas set mood. They can show the personality of the narrator, they can set the pace and drama and tone…or they can throw those things off completely. This post really illustrates how much thought an editor puts into the commas and how they best serve the tone of the manuscript.

Read Cheryl’s post, and think about it when you’re writing. There’s a lot of power in the subtle little comma!

  • Share/Bookmark