Archive for the 'Musings' Category

Creeps to Watch Out For

A manuscript is not a linear creature. We go back and change things. We revise a sentence. A paragraph. A concept. We reorder chapters. New content integrates with old. Ideally, it does this seamlessly.

However, a manuscript is also not a body of water. The changes made to the pages don’t ripple naturally through the rest of the text. (If only they did!) They need to be caught, by careful eye and hand. The mind is a tricky thing, and it often sees what it expects to see. When your eyes are so familiar with the words that you’re not entirely reading the page anymore, gradual or minor changes are very easy to miss.

Keeping aware of the tendency toward these kinds of mistakes is the best defense against them. Since they tend to creep stealthily into a manuscript, I call them creeps. This post will introduce you to two types of creep and discuss how you can guard yourself against them.

1. Creeping names.

You know this one. Your town starts out as Sullyville and changes to Sulleyville at some point halfway through the book. Character names, place names, and any other invented words are equally susceptible to the mid-manuscript creep.

Simple words, complex words, words with odd uses of apostrophes or hyphens, are all vulnerable! With complexity, however, comes increased vulnerability. You’re more likely to reproduce your choices correctly if you leave little room for variation. This is an especially sticky trap for science fiction and fantasy writers, whose texts are almost certain to be sprinkled with many invented words and unusual character and place names—if not a sampling of an entire invented language!

My defense against the creeping name is two-fold, but simple: I drop any invented name I expect to be seeing frequently into my spellchecker’s dictionary. That way, I’ll have a built-in notifier if any of them decide to evolve and change. I also keep a paper list of character and place names, for quick reference. Sometimes a name will creep to a valid name or word, so the spellcheck method isn’t guaranteed, but it is a great first line of defense. If I’m unsure, I can always glance down at the list on my desk for confirmation. You can avoid creeping names in your writing by doing the same. Storing character and place names in a document is also an option, but you may not always take the time to toggle back and forth between manuscript and file in the midst of inspiration. A written list that you can check at a glance is a simple tool, but an effective one.

2. Creeping NPCs.

NPC stands for “Non-Player Character.” In gaming circles, it’s a term used to indicate those incidental characters who exist only to forward a plot or facilitate a goal. The merchant from whom your characters buy their adventuring supplies, for instance, is probably a walk-on role. Once your characters leave his shop, the reader will likely never see him again. The character’s unseen brother back home, former roommate, ex-girlfriend or old high school teacher, whom he speaks about a few times but who is never seen, also counts as an NPC for our purposes.

The rule for NPCs is an obvious one: Name them once. However, several chapters and several months may go by while you’re working on your manuscript. As you’re working on chapter twenty, you may forget that Jane Doe was mentioned by name in chapter two. Or, conversely, as you’re editing in a personal touch to chapter two, you may forget that you named her in chapter twenty.

Again, a separate list comes in handy. At whatever point in the story you give your character a name, jot it down. Add their title or relation to your primary characters, as appropriate. If you give them any notable characteristics, note those, too. You can even start written biographies of sorts, of your characters, and profiles of your towns, adding to them as you name or describe relevant family members or neighbors. Usually names and vital stats are enough, but the more detail you set down, the easier it is to keep your story straight (so to speak) going forward.

Many of us keep our characters’ backgrounds in little capsules in our heads, pulling out strands or facts as needed. Setting those facts down in an easily referenced way can help the writer, and even inspire ideas for character development or transitionary scenes, and it can help the editor as well. Forward your lists along with your manuscript! If your sister is Jane in chapter two and Susan in chapter twenty, it’ll save both of us a query later on if I already know which name she prefers to go by. Not that your sister is, you know… a creep.

(reprinted from July, 2008)

  • Share/Bookmark

Librarians Love a Challenge

We’ve all gotten so accustomed to having the Internet at our fingertips no matter where we are, that it’s easy to forget that there are other resources available to us.

One of the benefits of going to the library and looking things up in actual books, is that in the process of doing your research, you may find ancillary information that fits in even better with your needs. Internet research can be almost too direct, at times: ask a specific enough question and you will only receive its specific answer. Sometimes a broader search can highlight options that might be a better fit for your story, or can serve as springboard to launch your ideas or solve something that might have you stuck.

I think that, these days, we’re also conditioned away from asking questions to real live people. Either we’re afraid we’ll look stupid, or we’re too concerned about being a bother, or we convince ourselves (usually for one of those reasons I just mentioned) that we’ll be turned away.

But the reality is that there are people who not only enjoy helping others to find the information that they need, but who have chosen to make a career out of it. Experts in a field will almost always be gracious to a writer who expresses a genuine interest in writing accurately about that field. Librarians are equally gracious about guiding you to the resources you need.

Stern “silence please” stereotypes aside, librarians are, on the whole, friendly and curious people. In my experience, if you present them a challenge and they don’t know how to help you, they will become genuinely interested in finding the answer. They may even adopt your quest for information as their own. They’ll be happy to continue assisting until they’ve tracked down satisfactory resources for you to continue your search, if not an actual result.

When you’re researching, remember to look beyond the Internet to other sources: books, living experts on a subject, and information specialists. Sometimes the network can put too much data at your fingertips, and other resources might provide a faster — or more interesting — path to what you need.

  • Share/Bookmark

Old Habits, New Tech

I’m one of those firm believers that e-books will never completely replace paper. There’s something comfortable about turning pages, something proud about showing off a collection on a shelf, and something exciting about getting a book signed by the author.

I also like the portability of a book, and being able to read in all the places where we read for comfort. I’m guilty of occasionally (carefully!) reading in the bathtub, or taking a book to the beach.

I know I’m not the first to come up with this, but I thought I’d share for those of you who have also been denying yourselves these pleasures. The other day I decided I really wanted to soak in the tub and read, and this was my solution: an inexpensive, readily available waterproof case for an e-reader that leaves the interface fully functional.


(Kindle version on the left, smaller version on the right for reading on the iPhone Kindle app!)

(Phone not pictured because it was used to take the photo.)

As long as you make very sure beforehand that the container is leakproof and fully sealed, it works like a charm!

  • Share/Bookmark

Foretold

A couple of weeks ago, I had the unenviable task of going back to my late mother’s empty house and trying to put it in order.

I won’t be keeping the house, but there were important papers that needed to be found and equipment to be returned and services to be terminated. It was difficult, stepping into someone’s world and feeling as though they had to still be there, because nothing but that one variable — her — had changed. It was something that I tried to make into a disconnected and emotionless exercise, in order to get through it, but of course it wasn’t. Less so because we were so close, because I had seen her so recently, and because it was all so sudden and unexpected.

When I was a child, in the late 70s, my mother worked for a small-time human rights activist as the editor of his magazine. She had a degree in English but she didn’t want to teach and didn’t know how to break into editing genre fiction (I am currently doing, she told me a couple of months ago, her dream job). Ultimately, she ended up making her career as a bookkeeper, but in the late 70s she wasn’t there yet. Instead she was, for a short time, an editor for a magazine.

When I was about six or seven, I ended up going to work with her one day. The office was a beautiful old brownstone in Washington, D.C., but there wasn’t much inside to hold a kid’s attention. To keep me busy, she set me up with copies of her own tools: rubber cement, a pair of scissors, a magazine, and a few blank pages. While she did her cut-and-paste layout for real (since cut-and-paste was literal in those days!), I copied her, cutting magazine ads, pasting them on the blank pages, circling words and red-penciling very important instructions in the margins.

It was just a couple hours of busywork to me, and I forgot all about it. I planned to be a musician — my dream from an early age — and I applied my energy in that direction. I have always loved reading, and to a more private extent, writing, but I fell into publishing and editing only about ten years ago, and found my calling in it more through serendipity than design.

So, it was stunning to find the faded old envelope in with my mother’s important papers, to open it up, and to pull out three crackly sheets of notebook paper bled through with rubber cement and stapled together, and to see on the cover in her neat block print, “GABRIELLE B_____” (my maiden name), “EDITOR.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Synergy

Sometimes the whole really can be larger than the sum of the parts. On many levels.

I find it to be true in my working relationships. Editing with Dragon Moon Press has introduced me to some fantastic people with whom I’ve had instant chemistry and rapport. Delving into something so creative and personal together is often a business transaction, but sometimes it becomes a bonding experience. Someone has let me into their head, to play around and explore there, to take detours down unmarked roads, and sometimes the journey of discovery leads to unexpected places. Some of the people I work with are not only clients and colleagues, they become valued friends too.

I find synergy in physical presence. Write in a room with someone else who’s writing, and there’s a chance that talking and distraction will prevent any work from getting done. But there’s also a chance that their discipline will motivate your weak moments, you in turn will motivate them, and without more than a sentence passed now and then or a curious glance over each others’ shoulders, you’ll accomplish more than you accomplish alone.

Creative energy and inspiration are contagious. Maybe knowing that you have the safety net of a person to bounce ideas off of gives you the confidence to work out solutions on your own. Maybe seeing someone else’s output just motivates you to keep up. Whatever the reason, it’s a thing of magic when it clicks.

There is also synergy in groups. My company is not just a technical staff plus a stable of authors. It’s a collective bank of ambition, determination, creativity and innovation. The amount of energy you put into it is what you get out of it, and a leap forward for one of us, helps us all.

Together, we can make great things happen. This is an exciting time. Lots of potentials are in the air, and good things are coming.

And we, every one of us, can be part of the driving force to make them possible, if we have two things: the ambition to reach for the stars, and the generosity of spirit to hold the ladder steady for each other.

Thanks to Gwen Gades, Erik Buchanan, Chris Jackson, Marie Bilodeau, the Ad Astra staff, Ed Greenwood, Phil Rossi, and all my Dragon Moon associates and colleagues current, planned, and future, the past seven days have been hugely inspiring for me. I hope you all can find this same energy too, now and forward.

  • Share/Bookmark

Hugo Nominees Announced

Congratulations to the 2010 Hugo Award Nominees!

From the Aussiecon 4 News feed:

“Aussiecon 4 received a record number of nominations for the 2010 Hugo Awards: 864, up from 799 nomination ballots at Anticipation in 2009 and 483 at Denvention 3 in 2008. This year’s Hugo Award nominations will be announced 22:00 BST, Easter Sunday 4 April, at Odyssey 2010, this year’s Eastercon, and covered live on the Aussiecon 4 Twitter feed. Balloting for the Hugo Awards will commence thereafter and will conclude on 31 July at midnight, US PDT. The Hugo Awards Ceremony will be held at Aussiecon 4 in Melbourne on Sunday, 5 September 2010.”

I’m equally proud for all the nominees, so I’m not going to plug any particular names or suggest how you should vote, I’m only going to suggest that you do vote. A supporting Worldcon membership is not that expensive, and it gives you something priceless: the power to support your favorite genre authors, editors and artists in a quantifiable way, and the ability to be a part of the F/SF community.

So, while I’m not going to plug any particular nominees or mention my own 2011 eligibility (Editor, Long Form), I am going to plug Cheryl Morgan’s post on the Blog Feminist SF. It talks about gender issues regarding the Hugo ballots, and it also talks about why you should vote, how to become eligible to vote, and how to vote… and how it’s perfectly okay to vote even if you haven’t read or seen everything in every category.

Because it’s okay to vote for what you like without familiarizing yourself with the whole ballot first, recognized names do stand a better chance. Does that make the Hugos a popularity contest? Maybe, in part. But author and client Nina Munteanu and I were discussing that at Worldcon last year, and Nina gave that a little twist. She suggested that maybe the nomination is a celebration a particular work, while winning can be looked at as a broader celebration of the career.

Or, maybe the Hugo ballot can be a list of recommended reading to track down if you’re wondering what to tackle next. It may introduce you to something new to love.

  • Share/Bookmark

Reflections in the Stacks

I’m sitting in a cozy chair in a bookstore down the street from where I live, as I’m writing this. It’s my first attempt to blog from my phone and we’ll see how it goes.

Walking in, I was struck pretty quickly by just how long it’s been since I wandered into a real, physical bookstore with time to kill, just to browse.

I go to bookstores fairly often. Borderlands, here in San Francisco, hosts lots of readings, signings and other events, and it’s become my “local” the way some people have a local pub. But I’m always going there with a purpose. To listen to a reading, see the cats, to meet clients or colleagues, to buy something specific or to escort an out-of-town guest who wants to buy a book for the trip home. But just to browse? Not very often at all.

Walking in, I was struck also by just how many books there are. That seems like a silly sort of epiphany to have in a bookstore, I suppose, especially if you’re in the book making business. Or maybe it might not seem so strange at all.

I’m surrounded by books all the time, in a way. I spend my days (and often my evenings, and my weekends…) with files that are destined to be books, and files that hope to be books. I write to people about books. I advise them and promote them and remind them to send their acknowledgements and dedications and blurbs. I keep up with the whole ebook debacle, and maybe spend more time reading about Agency Models and DRM than I should. I sleep and breathe books. It’s not the same, though, as walking through row after row of the finished product.

There’s a certain energy to it, probably because there’s a certain habit of working so intently with the raw materials that we lose sight of the finished product.

How do you feel when you walk through rows of books? Envious of their authors? Curious about their advances, or what specific obstacles were defeated to get each book where it is? Do you feel a renewed sense of determination and ambition? Do you look for the places on the shelves where your books would be filed? Do bookstores frustrate you, or inspire you?

Immersing yourself in the process and the work it takes to get there is a good thing, but stepping back and looking at the goal is a good thing, too. Books are what we’re all about. Take some time to appreciate them, what goes into them, how many of them there are… and what a fantastic thing it is–or will someday be–to see yours among them.

  • Share/Bookmark

Slush Rush Wrap-up

Initial responses have now been sent on all the queries I received during the Dragon Moon Press open submissions period. If you have not received either a rejection or a request for a full manuscript, I did not receive your query. Make sure you check the address posted in the submission guidelines and try again.

For a relatively-unadvertised submission period during a month that’s usually hectic for everyone, the volume was encouraging without being overwhelming. It was a great experience and I’ll definitely be doing it again.

    The useful stat breakdowns:

Full manuscripts were requested on just under 10% of submissions. Out of that 10%, I am making an offer to one (1) so far. (Yes, that one knows who they are.) I have not yet received or read all requested fulls.

About 25% of submissions did not comply with the posted submission guidelines, with deviations including (in order of frequency): submitting to the wrong address, lack of synopsis, lack of title (oops!), lack of sample pages and use of attachments.

No submissions were rejected for non-compliance. That is to say, I didn’t receive any queries that would have been accepted had they followed the guidelines more closely; the submissions that did not follow the guidelines had other issues which made them unsuitable.

    Reasons for rejection, in descending order of frequency:

1. The writing simply wasn’t good enough – Mediocre writing or storytelling, wooden and uncompelling characters; consistently poor grammar and sentence structure, etc. Just not at a publishable level.

2. Major plot flaws too deep to change – The premise was deeply flawed, too predictable or overused without offering anything new or notable, wasn’t compelling, or went in a direction that I didn’t think worked.

3. Too slow to get started, or so heavy-handed at setting up a plot that it all just felt contrived and sloppy – These submissions had fifteen pages to get me hooked and make me care. If nothing happened in those first fifteen, I wasn’t interested enough to keep going, and a customer wouldn’t keep reading, either. There’s some overlap here with #1, but sometimes the story can still be flat and not go anywhere even if the quality of the writing is good.

4. Too similar to something already published. OR, used characters or worlds copyrighted or licensed to someone other than the author, or otherwise contained inherent rights issues – Don’t try to get your fanfic published, kids, unless you’re trying to get it published by whatever company officially licenses it.

5. Not a fit. Non-fiction, true crime, gratuitous torture, sexual torture, sexual slavery and gore, mainstream fiction, spy thrillers, mysteries, and bodice rippers.

6. Good, but not quite there yet. Show me the author’s next one.

    The not-so-useful stat breakdowns:

(Trends that had no bearing on acceptance decisions, but are interesting to note)

* Genre breakdown:

    54% fantasy / dark fantasy
    26% urban fantasy
    15% science fiction / speculative fiction
    5% outside DMP’s range (non-fic, etc.)

* Gender breakdown: 40% female authors, 60% male.

* Manuscripts utilizing real historical figures as main or important characters: 5

* Manuscripts previously released as podcast fiction: 4

* Manuscripts that compared themselves to Twilight: 3

* Demons and angels were more popular than vampires by a margin of 4:1

* Manuscripts featuring gender-swapping or other body-swapping: 2

* Abrasive or insulting queries: 2

* Manuscripts with prologues: 20%

* Manuscripts submitted in languages other than English: 1

* Countries represented: 10 — a very respectable showing!

Thanks for participating, everyone, and keep writing.

  • Share/Bookmark

Hugo Nominations Now Open

Nominations are now open for the 2010 Hugo Awards, recognizing excellence in the field of science fiction and fantasy.

Members of last year’s Worldcon in Montreal and members who register for this year’s Worldcon in Melbourne are eligible to nominate and vote. You can also make your recommendations to other voters (and get an idea of theirs) at the hugo_recommend livejournal community.

2010 is the first year that I am eligible for a nomination in the Best Editor, Long Form category. The simple fact of being eligible is a thrill.

Being eligible, though, isn’t the same as being worthy.

Lou Anders, Editorial Director at Pyr, said it best in the Editors’ Roundtable interview in which we both participated for Clarkesworld Magazine last summer. He said:

    …discussing the “Best Editor—Long Form” Hugo[, one reader] stated, “Well, I don’t know how much the editing improved or hurt the original manuscript so I don’t know how to vote.” I don’t think that’s the part of an editor’s job that need concern the reader. Rather, it’s the mere fact that they are reading the book in question at all, versus any one of the hundreds of other manuscripts and pitches that crossed the editor’s desk in a specific year. I get pitched maybe two to three times a day now, and out of that, I select/publish under 30 books a year. So it isn’t so much about whether I caught a typo on page 256, or said, “Do you think you need to explain that obscure reference a little clearer?” —it’s the fact that you are reading the book at all that counts.

Winning a Hugo someday is a dream of mine, of course, but doing consistent Hugo-worthy work is my real goal. My work is not Hugo-worthy yet, but I’m on the right path, learning my way one step at a time.

In 2009, Dragon Moon Press published six books in which I was deeply involved. DMP published perhaps a similar number to which I contributed a single proofreading pass, but that I don’t consider “my” books in the same way, and that I don’t count as my credits on my own website or on sites like the SF Editorwatch wiki.

Of those six books, only one was chosen for publication by me. I keep saying that publishing is a slow business? Well, all those contracts were already signed and sealed before I took on my role as Editor-in-Charge.

The “best editor” Hugo isn’t about catching the most typos or bringing about the best transformation from manuscript to final draft. It’s about having the eye to pick out exceptional manuscripts and bring books and authors of consistent and reliable quality to print.

Before I set out as an editor, I worked as a pricing analyst for a large publishing house. It was my job to work on sales forecasts, using past history and like items to determine how many copies a book would sell, so that we would know how many copies to print. I was in the business because I love the books, first and foremost, so I read all the books I could get my hands on.

I read the books that sold well; I read the books that didn’t sell well. I read the books that were fads that quickly faded and the books that were consistent classics. And when I read the books with the sales numbers at my side and my “trend-spotting” reflexes sharply honed, I started to develop an eye for the qualities that make a book a classic — the characteristics that make it great, and enduring.

It was with that behind me that I went into professional editing, and it’s from that experience that I still draw. In 2009, I stepped out from behind the red pencil and into the slush pile. As a result, you’ll be seeing a lot more of “my” picks in 2010, and I’m excited about the books you’ll be seeing from us. We’ve got some excellent fantasy and science fiction lined up.

Starting in 2011, I’ll be able to say “I chose these books for you.” That’ll be another big step closer to that goal, and you can be sure that I’ll be working all year with determination, ambition and integrity to get there and keep going.

This year, it’s a big enough thrill just to be eligible, and to have the opportunity to discover great books and great authors. It’s been an honor and a joy to work with great writers, and to meet and learn from some of the most talented and insightful minds in the industry in 2009, and the future only looks brighter. “Begin as you mean to go on,” they say at each new year — here’s looking ahead to a brilliant 2010.

  • Share/Bookmark

Stereotype as Filler

The easiest way to make a support character feel like a gratuitous plot-enabler is to make them a stereotype, to fill the same sort of niche we always see them fill.

“A rude waitress has to spill the coffee on her so that she has to go home and change clothes and that’s how she avoids being downtown when the aliens attack.”

I’m tired of the rude waitress, the inept cop, the mean teacher, and the insensitive doctor. On the whole, people with these behaviors don’t tend to stay in these jobs very successfully, or very long. They’re used as exceptions, because there’s humor or drama or something eyecatching in the exception, but the novelty that drives these exceptions and makes them interesting is lost when the exceptions become the norm. Then they just become plot devices, and it shows.

When you use a cliche, ask yourself why you’re using it and if it needs to be there. Chances are that it doesn’t, but if you really want a character to be a stereotype, just find an interesting way to use the device. Give them a reason for it. They could start out okay and have their behavior degrade over time, for some interesting reason. They could realize their trouble and try to grow and change, and let the reader cheer them on. Or there could be some reason for it that we discover, that helps us understand why they behave the way they do, or why they’re in the job they’re in despite not being a great match for it. The police chief hiring his inept son as a cop has been done a million times, but at least it supplies a reason for the cop to be inept.

I’d rather see a bad guy elude a skilled cop — that takes more talent! I’d rather see a well-meaning waitress spill coffee on someone and feel awful about it. That adds more to the story. And I’d like to see the conflict in a sensitive doctor who still has to deliver bad news. That’s where a minor character shines and brings depth to a story, even if they’re only “on screen” for a couple of pages.

  • Share/Bookmark