Editing and Short Fiction

Should I bother hiring an editor to look over my short fiction, or is it a waste of time?

While it’s often dismissed as not being worth the effort, there are a lot of advantages to hiring an editor for short fiction.

1. It’s short! That means it’ll be considerably less expensive than hiring an editor on a novel. It’s a great chance to try out an editor, see how well you work together, and see what issues they can identify constructively in your writing.

2. The short fiction market is competitive. It’s every bit as competitive as the novel-length fiction market, if not moreso. Therefore, your story should be as polished and perfect as possible before you send it off to compete with other stories for attention.

3. In short fiction, every word counts! This is true in a novel, too, but in novels you have a bit more leeway. In short fiction you’re limited to just a few thousand words to draw the reader in and give them a setting, rounded characters, and a plot from beginning to end.

4. Writers often zip short fiction out more quickly, do fewer rewrites, and generally spend less time looking at it. That makes it even more important to have an extra set of eyes checking on all the details.

5. Short fiction will take an editor less time, so you’ll likely be able to get very quick turnaround. I’ve snuck in a short story edit for a writer during our lunch break at a convention, so that she could make the changes and show it to an interested market the next day. I can’t promise THAT kind of service, but it will certainly be a shorter time frame (less waiting, less time to foster your red-ink anxiety!) than for a novel.

6. All the tips, hints, and corrections you receive on your short story can also be applied to the rest of your writing. You may learn something about where your weaknesses are as a writer, which words you misspell or overuse, learn “rules” you never knew about a grammatical device or punctuation mark, or style conventions in published fiction. These and plenty other personalized observations that will make your writing — all your writing — stronger.

  • Share/Bookmark

Renaissance Woman

Interview: Gabrielle Harbowy, Renaissance Woman, courtesy of The Dead Robots’ Society Podcast

It was a pleasure to meet up with the wonderful crew of the Dead Robots’ Society Podcast this week for an interview. It was a particular honor because the DRS interview with editor Juliet Ulman had been so inspirational for me. Working in an isolated sort of environment like editors do, and doing work that should (if it’s done well) be invisible, doesn’t lend itself to having access to many role models. Hearing Juliet talk about editing and express eloquently so many of the things I believe, or aim to do in my work, or have observed in my own experience so far, helped to affirm for me that I was doing it right — both in terms of how I approach authors and their work, and how I approach my own career.

My interview was a long time coming. Various scheduling obstacles kept getting in the way, but I’m glad that the interest and determination held on both sides. It was a lot of fun, and it turned out to be completely unlike the other interviews I’ve done.

What’s changed? Well… I think… me.

Instead of focusing on how to format a submission, or how to edit, or when to edit, the interview focused on how I balance being an editor, an associate publisher, and a writer.

It was especially interesting because I don’t really think of myself as a writer. Not yet.

I’ve got one story, “Swimming Lessons” up in PG Holyfield’s “Tales of the Children” podcast anthology. That story is on the longlist for a Parsec Award(!).

I have another story — my first professional sale! — which will be appearing in an anthology this December. More news as the date nears, or you can listen to the interview for a couple more hints.

I have a story out on someone’s desk at a major market, and two more in the works.

But editing comes first for me. Though I think I’m constantly learning and improving in all aspects of the business and editing is no exception, it’s where I feel I really shine. And for me, editing blends naturally into publishing. I’m so used to being “hands on” with a novel, having held it from slush pile through editorial, that it seems natural to be the one to take it into typesetting and layout, to discuss promotional opportunities and offer to be the contact person for reviewers and award committees.

Would I be content “just editing”? Could I give those extra responsibilities up? Sure. But I like being busy, and I’m grateful for the opportunity and for the insight I’m gaining into the industry by being able to be more involved in different aspects of it.

I feel the same way about writing. I’m discovering that I enjoy it, and I’m also enjoying the “sensitivity training” that it lends to my editing. I have a different perspective on a lot of things now: I’m more aware of the agonizing wait for authors with work on somebody’s slush pile; I’m more aware of the uncertainty someone feels when they open up a file full of red ink. I feel that I can relate to my clients a little better, because I’m one of them. I understand their half of the experience.

All around, I’d say it’s all easy to balance. Each side of the triangle — writing, editing, publishing — gives me more insight on the other two. All together, it’s an invaluable, ongoing education. Even if I end up focusing more narrowly on one facet or the other down the road, I’ll still be able to bring to it a rounded perspective on the industry that will always inform my actions, no matter what I’m working on from day to day.

Thanks again to the guys at DRS for having me on and inviting me to share my thoughts!

You can follow the Dead Robots’ Society on the web at DeadRobotsSociety.com
on Twitter at @DRSPodcast
and on Facebook at Listeners of the Dead Robots’ Society.

  • Share/Bookmark

Call for Reviewers

Do you run or contribute to a book review site?

Are you looking for more science fiction, fantasy, adult or YA-friendly books to review? Do you accept electronic copies?

Dragon Moon Press is looking to form relationships with book review websites and blogs. If you’re interested in receiving PDF reader copies for review, please drop me a line at eic @ dragonmoonpress.com with the following information:

  • Your name and contact information
  • Your blog’s address and title
  • Your estimated readership (hit count)
  • What genre / age range you prefer
  • Whether you prefer to review pre- or post-publication

Reviews must be posted on review sites and/or bookseller sites.

  • Share/Bookmark

ARCs 101

ARC stands for Advance Reader Copy. ARCs can also called bound galleys, bound proofs, or uncorrected proofs. An ARC looks like a book, walks like a book and quacks like a book, but it’s not quite a book. It’s actually the bound proofs, printed as a test run so that the production team can do a final check and make sure everything’s set for printing, and so that advance copies can be distributed to readers for things like author blurbs and pre-publication reviews.

ARC does not stand for Advanced Reader Copy. That’s one of my pet peeves. It’s Advance, as in “in advance of publication.” I think an Advanced Reader Copy would be a special edition with harder vocabulary substituted in!

I’m still learning the ins and outs of ARC creation, and since it’s an ongoing process (involving some trial and error) for me, I’m going to share the basics with you.

    Some Basic Considerations

ARCs are much more commonly printed and distributed by larger presses. From a small press, they’re rare. That’s both due to budget issues and time issues. Printing a small run is more expensive per book than printing a large run because the set-up costs are spread out over fewer copies. It’s also difficult for a small press, which usually operates on narrower time schedules, to have a book “in the can” and ready for reviewers in time to meet the three- or four-month window that pre-publication reviewers need.

Why not send out the manuscript in whatever state it happens to be in when that time window comes about? Nooooo. Bad idea.

ARCs are generally labeled “UNCORRECTED PROOF,” and that forgives a few glaring sins, but it’s still the first impression you’re going to be making on your reviewer or your favorite successful author. You’re asking people who don’t know you to say wonderful things about your work, so you want it to be as polished and ready as it can possibly be. ARCs are a chance to scan for the little last-minute formatting and typo issues that have slipped through the cracks. A few of those things will be forgiven. That doesn’t mean you’ve got carte blanche to send out a manuscript that still obviously needs attention, rewrites, plot changes, or a good sandblasting from a proofreader. You also don’t want to send something out that’s significantly different than the final product, to an extent that a comment someone may make regarding the draft might not be true when applied to the finished book.

    Components of an ARC

Like any book, an ARC needs a cover. If the cover art is ready, a publisher may use it, but it (deliberately) won’t look like the actual finished book. The art may be an inset picture on the cover instead of taking up the whole cover, or it may be in black and white, or it may be the ink drawing instead of the completed illustration — something to show that this isn’t the finished product and to differentiate it from the final book.

The title and author’s name should be boldly visible on the cover and the inside front page, and so should the words “Advance Reader Copy” and “Uncorrected Proof” and “Not for Sale.” Some publishers use variations on these themes, or stamp them confidential, etc. Other vital information is included right on the cover: the publisher, ISBN, and final format (mass market, trade paperback, etc.). Also good to include: release date and genre. On the back cover, some selling points to convince your readers that your book has a market: a quick blurb, a little info about the author, and the contact information for the publisher so that if someone wants to write a review or submit a glowing quote, they can. (ARCs generally ship with a “fact sheet” from the publisher that contains all this information, but the fact sheet can get separated from the book, so it’s best if all the basics that a reviewer would need are also printed on the book itself.)

The interior features proper book layout — this is the “dress rehearsal” for publication, after all. That means chapter headings and page numbers are in their proper places, someone’s given attention to widows and orphans and other layout issues, your italics are italicised and your indents are uniformly indented, and the margins account for the spine and the outer edge of the page. It’s more than simply dropping in a Word file and hitting “print.”

    Mailing Etiquette

If a reviewer has posted instructions about how they prefer to receive review copies, follow those instructions. If they haven’t, send a polite query requesting a review. An interested reviewer will respond in the affirmative and provide an address. Unless a reviewer has stated that they’re open to all submissions, or you’ve got an ongoing relationship with them, it’s safer not to assume that one yes for one book is a blanket yes for every book you ever print from that point onward. Thank them for the kind things they said about the previous book and ask if they’re interested in the next one.

This especially goes for professional authors who are kind enough to take time out of their own busy schedules to read a whole book and potentially give you a blurb on it. You’re asking them to give you a flattering comment that you can publish, to link their reputation with yours, and basically to do you a huge favor for no compensation. Taking an entitled or pushy attitude, taking their generosity for granted, or acting as though their time is “owed” to you, is a great way to ensure that your favorite author never does you a favor again.

    Are ARCs Worth It?

It depends on the book, the time frame, and what you want to accomplish. If you (or your publisher) think you’ve got a shot at getting a great Publisher’s Weekly review, or you have a lot of connections in high places who might be willing to give you a really great quote, then yes.

If you’ve just got a couple of connections and they’d be willing to accept a digital file, then you can save time and money by attaching a digital ARC to an email and going from there. As eReaders make looking at digital files a more and more comfortable (and portable) experience, more people are willing to accept a document file or PDF in lieu of the “real thing.”

Another important note: Think hard and objectively about your book before you send it out for review. Giving your book to a reviewer is a calculated risk. We all know that, and yet we’re all optimistic enough to take the chance and hope that it doesn’t blow up in our faces, but you have to accept the chance that it might. You have no guarantee that a reviewer will choose your book to review; you have even less of a guarantee that a reviewer will give your book a good review. Some of the major reviews (ALA, Kirkus, PW) link directly into Amazon. They will be the first thing that anyone browsing your book online will see, until the end of time.

Seek the counsel of your publisher, your editor, and your professional author contacts if you’re on a casual enough basis with them — basically, ask objective people who are not your friends or family members, and who are not afraid to be honest with you. Your book may be a great book, yet it’s possible that it may not be Shakespeare or Stephen King… and keep in mind that they’ve gotten bad reviews, too. If you’re not prepared for the possibility of a bad review, you’re not ready to send your work to the major reviewers. And if you’re not sending it to the major reviewers, then a digital ARC or just a post-publication copy is probably just fine for everyone else.

    The DIY Approach

If you’re with a small press that doesn’t have the budget for ARCs, BUT you’ve got a large number of connections that could potentially give you an excellent blurb or you’re absolutely certain that you’ve got a shot at a great review from ALA Booklist, AND your book is ready with enough of a time window, approach your publisher about ARCs. If they don’t plan to print them, see if they’ll allow you to do it yourself, or to reimburse them for the expense.

Self-publishing an ARC is not the same as self-publishing a book. Also, an author offering to do help with publicity out of his own pocket is not the same as a disreputable publisher scamming someone into paying money for a service. It’s more like offering to print up your own posters to take to a convention or a signing. You can snag a small number of very plain copies pretty cheaply (about $6-$15 per book in my experience, depending on size, page count and other options) and make the book private (if you use an online printing company) so that no one else can order it. Depending on your financial situation, you may consider laying out about $100 to be a good investment if it brings you an excellent pull quote to use on your final cover.

Generally, even a small press will want the best for your book and will want to help you market and promote it as widely as possible, even if they don’t have the time, budget or staff to do all of that for you themselves. Therefore, if they say no, accept their decision and understand that they probably have a very good reason for it. Going around behind your publisher’s back is a breach of contract, which is NOT COOL and will likely leave you with a canceled contract and no book at all. But if the file can be ready on time, if they deem the calculated risk to be worth it, and if all other factors align, it doesn’t hurt to have asked.

    A Final Note…

If your publisher doesn’t print ARCs of your book, DON’T TAKE IT PERSONALLY. There are tons of factors that go into publication for each book, and none of them should in any way imply that the book is a bad book or that you’re a bad author, or that you’ve been in any way slighted. If your publisher thought it was a lousy book, they wouldn’t be printing it. Don’t get bitter, or discouraged, or jealous of authors who have printed ARCs. There are plenty of ways to get notice for your book (and for a small press most of the others are, honestly, more successful).

Focus on your own opportunities, make the most of them, and approach your publisher with the optimism and enthusiasm to work as a team and find strategies best suited to your book, your strengths, and your publisher’s means.

  • Share/Bookmark

Old Habits, New Tech

I’m one of those firm believers that e-books will never completely replace paper. There’s something comfortable about turning pages, something proud about showing off a collection on a shelf, and something exciting about getting a book signed by the author.

I also like the portability of a book, and being able to read in all the places where we read for comfort. I’m guilty of occasionally (carefully!) reading in the bathtub, or taking a book to the beach.

I know I’m not the first to come up with this, but I thought I’d share for those of you who have also been denying yourselves these pleasures. The other day I decided I really wanted to soak in the tub and read, and this was my solution: an inexpensive, readily available waterproof case for an e-reader that leaves the interface fully functional.


(Kindle version on the left, smaller version on the right for reading on the iPhone Kindle app!)

(Phone not pictured because it was used to take the photo.)

As long as you make very sure beforehand that the container is leakproof and fully sealed, it works like a charm!

  • Share/Bookmark

Foretold

A couple of weeks ago, I had the unenviable task of going back to my late mother’s empty house and trying to put it in order.

I won’t be keeping the house, but there were important papers that needed to be found and equipment to be returned and services to be terminated. It was difficult, stepping into someone’s world and feeling as though they had to still be there, because nothing but that one variable — her — had changed. It was something that I tried to make into a disconnected and emotionless exercise, in order to get through it, but of course it wasn’t. Less so because we were so close, because I had seen her so recently, and because it was all so sudden and unexpected.

When I was a child, in the late 70s, my mother worked for a small-time human rights activist as the editor of his magazine. She had a degree in English but she didn’t want to teach and didn’t know how to break into editing genre fiction (I am currently doing, she told me a couple of months ago, her dream job). Ultimately, she ended up making her career as a bookkeeper, but in the late 70s she wasn’t there yet. Instead she was, for a short time, an editor for a magazine.

When I was about six or seven, I ended up going to work with her one day. The office was a beautiful old brownstone in Washington, D.C., but there wasn’t much inside to hold a kid’s attention. To keep me busy, she set me up with copies of her own tools: rubber cement, a pair of scissors, a magazine, and a few blank pages. While she did her cut-and-paste layout for real (since cut-and-paste was literal in those days!), I copied her, cutting magazine ads, pasting them on the blank pages, circling words and red-penciling very important instructions in the margins.

It was just a couple hours of busywork to me, and I forgot all about it. I planned to be a musician — my dream from an early age — and I applied my energy in that direction. I have always loved reading, and to a more private extent, writing, but I fell into publishing and editing only about ten years ago, and found my calling in it more through serendipity than design.

So, it was stunning to find the faded old envelope in with my mother’s important papers, to open it up, and to pull out three crackly sheets of notebook paper bled through with rubber cement and stapled together, and to see on the cover in her neat block print, “GABRIELLE B_____” (my maiden name), “EDITOR.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Can Bad Spellers Be Good Writers?

I’m going to start keeping a running tally of people who have said to me, “I have a lot of ideas, but I could never be a writer because my spelling is horrible.”

It’s something I hear often enough that I’ve already lost count, and I consider it a very sad thing. There are plenty of great writers who admit that their spelling isn’t the best — that’s why they have editors!

There’s a difference between being a good writer and a good speller. There’s an even bigger difference between being a good storyteller and a good speller. Writing and storytelling are talents that not everyone has, and they’re much harder to fake if you don’t have the knack for them. Spelling, though? That’s easy.

As long as you know your weaknesses, you can own them and conquer them.

  • Spell-check can be a guide, but don’t depend solely on it. There’s a lot that it doesn’t catch. Still, it’s a good start.

  • Many computer operating systems have a dictionary widget that sits right on your desktop; fire that up, and as you’re writing, plug in any word you’re not sure about.
      (There’s an inherent paradox here, I know: how do you look up the spelling of a word you don’t know how to spell? It’s easy. Type in your attempt. If it comes up, with the right definition, it means you were right. If not, start playing with it. Usually the beginning of a word is straightforward, and usually there are only a few possible variations if you sound it out. Trial and error can often get you on the right path. If not, try looking up a word that means the same thing and see if your word comes up in the definition, or try a thesaurus. Frequently misspelled words will often trigger a “Did you mean this other word?” suggestion on Google or your other favorite search engine. So no, you don’t have to know how a word is spelled to find out how to spell it.)
  • Ask a trusted friend to read through what you’ve written and mark corrections on it. Take the feedback constructively and not as criticism, and pay attention to the words you’ve missed.

These tips don’t just apply to your manuscript, either. If need be, ask someone to eye your query letter and other correspondence, as well.

Above all, learn to spot trends. If you get a sense of words you habitually misuse or misspell, it’ll be easier for you to catch those words for yourself in the future. If you have trouble spotting the trends, make yourself a list of each word you’ve misspelled, and tally up the number of times those words appear. It’ll feel a little uncomfortable to go through your own writing so critically, but that careful attention is what helps us all improve.

By the time you’re ready to submit to a publisher or an agent, no one will know what went into cleaning your work up. They’ll just see an impeccable story that stands on its own merits.

You definitely don’t have to be a good speller to be a good or successful writer, you just have to be able to play one!

  • Share/Bookmark

Marketing Tips for the Introverted Author

Fans who see authors at signings and readings and conventions may not realize that authors — just like anyone else — can be introverted, can get stage fright, or can be uncomfortable approaching others or putting themselves in the limelight. It’s one thing for a book to get great acclaim; it’s another thing to squint into the spotlight, yourself.

Last week, Marketing Tips for Authors blog featured a post by Duolit, called Conquering Book Marketing Fear: Seven Tips for the Introverted Author.

This post discusses ways to overcome that fear of putting yourself out there, and has some great tips for brand-building for everyone, introvert or not.

  • Share/Bookmark

Contact Information

Two friendly reminders about contact information…

1. It seems silly, I know, but please put your contact information (including your email address) in the body of your email. Down at the bottom after your signature is a fine place.

Sometimes when some email programs forward messages, or sometimes when some email programs print messages, the “from:” line gets changed, or cut off.

2. It seems even sillier, I know, but please make sure that your contact information, as given, actually works.

A rejection letter isn’t good news, but at least it’s closure. I feel bad when one bounces back to me. I feel even worse when my request to see more of a manuscript bounces back. And I just feel frustrated when someone’s apparently got their mail sending through a defunct address, so that they can write to me multiple times (sometimes with escalating animosity) but my replies don’t get back to them.

(3. As a side note, it’s a matter of personal taste as to whether an electronic query needs to contain your physical mailing address. Some require it, some don’t. I find the information interesting from a demographics-collecting perspective, but unnecessary at the query stage since I’m not going to mail out a physical reply letter. I don’t “need” it until there’s a contract being signed.)

  • Share/Bookmark

Advice for Copyeditors

I’m trying to get ready to go out of town and deal with the loose ends regarding my mother’s estate, so today’s post will be short and sweet, and Thursday’s post may well be absent, or equally brief.

This blog often offers advice for new writers, but advice for new copyeditors is very important as well.

The Subversive Copyeditor blogged some random advice for copyeditor newbies today, and it’s all important stuff.

I would move back a step and add a few absolute basics to that excellent list:

  • Pick a single style guide and a single dictionary and stick to them. It should be no surprise that different style guides (Chicago vs AP vs MLA) will feature very different rules. If they didn’t, each style of publication wouldn’t have its own. However, different dictionaries will also allow/feature slight variations. Don’t pick the one that agrees with you on a particular word, pick one standard reference and make it your guide. I also pick one standard backup dictionary, just in case.

  • Look up EVERYTHING you think you know. Sometimes colloquial usage isn’t the same as correct usage. Before you switch “never mind” to one word throughout a manuscript because that’s the way you’ve always spelled it, look it up. Look up “lie/lay/lain/laid” and make yourself a grid. Don’t go with what “sounds right,” take the time to find out what IS right.
  • Don’t overcorrect, either. Editing fiction isn’t the same as editing non-fiction. There’s a lot more latitude in fiction, especially in regard to dialogue and narrative voice. If a character is young, uneducated, informal, or would have some other reason to use “there’s” to mean “there are,” let the character use it. If a character never uses contractions, ever, then help the author stay true to that style choice. It’s important to develop a sense of what to correct and what to leave alone.
  • If you find yourself looking up the same things all the time, write them out on a separate cheat-sheet for yourself. I do this for things like grey/gray (I never remember which one is the UK spelling and which one is US), or whether song lyrics get quotation marks or italics. I always write out the full rule with the citation so that I can cite my source without having to go back to the book.
  • Be aware of your tone with clients, whether authors or employers. Keep it professional but approachable. Never, ever taunt or insult a client for a mistake in the manuscript or word your queries in such a way as to imply a value judgment about the manuscript or the specific choices therein. In your queries and comments, speak in terms of rules of grammar or style, in terms of character consistency, or ambiguity of phrase, or the conventions of the genre. It’s okay to use a lighthearted tone if you’ve got sufficient rapport with a client to do so appropriately (and even then, know the boundaries). Don’t go over the line into too familiar, too risque, patronizing, or disapproving. It’s not your place.
  • If you’ve decided to make cold calls (writing or calling a publisher to ask them if they have work they can give you), do your homework before you send a letter to someone and ask them to hire you. Get your contact name right, and get the gender of that contact person right, too. Please spell-check your letter. Check to make sure that you remove the lingering form-letter bits from your last letter that don’t fit your current one. And, just like writers submitting queries for manuscripts, take an extra moment to find out if they’re actually hiring, and if they have a process for sending that letter. Editing is a detail-oriented job, so you’ll only shoot yourself in the foot if you fail to pay attention to the details when you make your first impression.

(Also see: The Last-Glance Editing Checklist)

  • Share/Bookmark