<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gabrielle Edits &#187; spelling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gabrielle-edits.com/tag/spelling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gabrielle-edits.com</link>
	<description>Editor -- Substantive and Copyediting: Fiction, Science Fiction, Fantasy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:41:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Can Bad Spellers Be Good Writers?</title>
		<link>http://www.gabrielle-edits.com/2010/07/06/spelling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gabrielle-edits.com/2010/07/06/spelling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabrielle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips and Hints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gabrielle-edits.com/?p=1274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m going to start keeping a running tally of people who have said to me, &#8220;I have a lot of ideas, but I could never be a writer because my spelling is horrible.&#8221; It&#8217;s something I hear often enough that I&#8217;ve already lost count, and I consider it a very sad thing. There are plenty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I&#8217;m going to start keeping a running tally of people who have said to me, &#8220;I have a lot of ideas, but I could never be a writer because my spelling is horrible.&#8221; </p>
<p>It&#8217;s something I hear often enough that I&#8217;ve already lost count, and I consider it a very sad thing. There are plenty of great writers who admit that their spelling isn&#8217;t the best &#8212; that&#8217;s why they have editors! </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a difference between being a good writer and a good speller. There&#8217;s an even bigger difference between being a good storyteller and a good speller. Writing and storytelling are talents that not everyone has, and they&#8217;re much harder to fake if you don&#8217;t have the knack for them. Spelling, though? That&#8217;s easy. </p>
<p>As long as you <i>know</i> your weaknesses, you can own them and conquer them. </p>
<ul>
<li> Spell-check can be a guide, but don&#8217;t depend solely on it. There&#8217;s a lot that it doesn&#8217;t catch. Still, it&#8217;s a good start.</p>
<li> Many computer operating systems have a dictionary widget that sits right on your desktop; fire that up, and as you&#8217;re writing, plug in any word you&#8217;re not sure about.
<ul>(There&#8217;s an inherent paradox here, I know: how do you look up the spelling of a word you don&#8217;t know how to spell? It&#8217;s easy. Type in your attempt. If it comes up, with the right definition, it means you were right. If not, start playing with it. Usually the beginning of a word is straightforward, and usually there are only a few possible variations if you sound it out. Trial and error can often get you on the right path. If not, try looking up a word that means the same thing and see if your word comes up in the definition, or try a thesaurus. Frequently misspelled words will often trigger a &#8220;Did you mean this other word?&#8221; suggestion on Google or your other favorite search engine. So no, you don&#8217;t have to know how a word is spelled to find out how to spell it.)</ul>
<li> Ask a trusted friend to read through what you&#8217;ve written and <i>mark corrections on it</i>. Take the feedback constructively and not as criticism, and pay attention to the words you&#8217;ve missed.</ul>
<p>These tips don&#8217;t just apply to your manuscript, either. If need be, ask someone to eye your query letter and other correspondence, as well. </p>
<p>Above all, learn to spot trends. If you get a sense of words you habitually misuse or misspell, it&#8217;ll be easier for you to catch those words for yourself in the future. If you have trouble spotting the trends, make yourself a list of each word you&#8217;ve misspelled, and tally up the number of times those words appear. It&#8217;ll feel a little uncomfortable to go through your own writing so critically, but that careful attention is what helps us all improve.</p>
<p>By the time you&#8217;re ready to submit to a publisher or an agent, no one will know what went into cleaning your work up. They&#8217;ll just see an impeccable story that stands on its own merits. </p>
<p>You definitely don&#8217;t have to be a good speller to be a good or successful writer, you just have to be able to play one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gabrielle-edits.com/2010/07/06/spelling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Words to Watch Out For</title>
		<link>http://www.gabrielle-edits.com/2009/11/30/words-to-watch-out-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gabrielle-edits.com/2009/11/30/words-to-watch-out-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabrielle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips and Hints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gabrielle-edits.com/?p=865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spellcheck is your fair weather friend. It doesn&#8217;t catch everything, and it can&#8217;t be relied upon when it counts. You can hang out with it for as far as it goes, but don&#8217;t depend on it when your life (or career) depends on proper spelling. I&#8217;ve seen the words and phrases below misused frequently in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Spellcheck is your fair weather friend. It doesn&#8217;t catch everything, and it can&#8217;t be relied upon when it counts. You can hang out with it for as far as it goes, but don&#8217;t depend on it when your life (or career) depends on proper spelling.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen the words and phrases below misused frequently in queries and in manuscripts. I strongly recommend that all writers remain aware of spellcheck&#8217;s limitations and do a special check for the following sneaky words (and others like them) when you&#8217;re going back over your writing.</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;bated breath&#8221; &#8212; &#8220;baited&#8221; is common but incorrect. It should be <a href="http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-bai1.htm">bated</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>bath / bathe &#8212; Bath is the noun, bathe is the verb. You take a bath, but you don&#8217;t bath in the tub.</i>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>blond/e &#8212; Blond/e is a gendered word, as I&#8217;ve mentioned here before, so both are correct and both are incorrect, depending on context.  &#8220;Blond&#8221; is male, and &#8220;blonde&#8221; is female.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>breath / breathe &#8212; Breath is the noun. Breathe is the verb.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>canvas / canvass &#8212; The first is the fabric. The second is not.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>discreet / discrete &#8212; If you&#8217;re writing about prudence and judicious behavior, you probably want the former.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>lightning / lightening &#8212; I see many writers use the second when they mean the first.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>loath / loathe &#8212; The first is a strong reluctance to do something. The second is a verb that means &#8220;to despise&#8221;.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>lose / loose &#8212; Nothing will bring a pained cringe to an editor or English teacher the way switching these two words will. Please don&#8217;t try it.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>past / passed &#8212; Second only to lose / loose</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>rein/reign, including &#8220;free rein&#8221;. Like &#8220;bated breath&#8221;, this phrase has been spelled and justified both ways so many times that it&#8217;s left a lot of uncertainty as to its correct use. However, &#8220;free rein&#8221; is a figurative expression based in equestrian origin, and meaning &#8220;to give a person freedom of authority, as one would loosen the reins on a horse&#8221;,  so &#8220;rein&#8221; it is.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>viscous / vicious &#8212; An accidental slip between these two words can create sentences that are confusing at worst, unintentially humorous at best&#8230; but never impressive in a good way.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gabrielle-edits.com/2009/11/30/words-to-watch-out-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

